From the Shuttle Section at NASA: Space Shuttle Discovery is Ready.

     The countdown to launch of space shuttle Discovery on the STS-120 mission is proceeding smoothly at NASA's Kennedy Space Center in Florida, NASA Test Director Steve Payne announced at this morning's countdown status briefing.

     "At this point in the count, we're on schedule, our systems are all good and we're in great shape," Payne said, adding that the launch team is not tracking any technical issues.

Image above: Attired in training versions of their shuttle launch and entry suits, the STS-120 crew members await the start of a training session in the Space Vehicle Mockup Facility at Johnson Space Center. From the left are astronauts Pamela A. Melroy, STS-120 commander; Daniel M. Tani, Expedition 16 flight engineer; George D. Zamka, STS-120 pilot; Douglas H. Wheelock, Scott E. Parazynski, Stephanie D. Wilson and European Space Agency's (ESA) Paolo Nespoli, all mission specialists. Image credit: NASA

     Shuttle Launch tomorrow at 11:38am EDT, 10:38 CDT, 9:38 MDT, 8:30PDT and some god awful hour in Hawaii.  I as usual will watch live on NASA TV or over the internet, you should too.  The mission is STS-120, which will deliver the Harmony node to the ISS. Full info about the mission plan here: Mission Overview.  and about the payload here: Payload Information.

Discovery Ready on the launch pad for STS-120.

Posted by: raging tachikoma at 11:16 PM | No Comments | Add Comment
Post contains 234 words, total size 2 kb.

Tachikoma Robot

Sadly this to be found at the bottom of the page "The robot is not for sale, just for DVD promotion."

I want one of these things so bad, but I can't have one.  If it is any cosolation no one else can either.  Still this thing would make them a bundle if they would sell it. 

Posted by: raging tachikoma at 02:50 AM | No Comments | Add Comment
Post contains 63 words, total size 1 kb.

Its Nice to be ahead of the curve sometimes.

From the China Post: Who's afraid of the Dalai Lama? China's Communists, apparently.

     Wednesday the Dalai Lama received the Congressional Gold Medal, Congress's highest civilian honor, and China is throwing a fit. "We are furious," the Chinese Communist Party's secretary for Tibet, Zhang Qingli, declared this week. "If the Dalai Lama can receive such an award, there must be no justice or good people in the world." In recent days, China has abruptly withdrawn from a summit on Iran and canceled a meeting with German Chancellor Angela Merkel, who received the Dalai Lama in September. Beijing, which according to The Post "solemnly demanded" that the Bush administration cancel Washington events planned for the Dalai Lama, is determined to punish and intimidate anyone who might pay tribute to Tibet's Nobel laureate.

     Why is the mighty People's Republic of China so petrified of this 72-year-old Buddhist monk? True, the Dalai Lama is no ordinary scholar and teacher; he is the living symbol of the Buddhist faith. It seems that Beijing's cadres fear his moral authority and do not want the international community to examine their record in Tibet, because they have a lot to hide.

     It has been 48 years since the Dalai Lama eluded capture by the People's Liberation Army and escaped to India, whereupon Chairman Mao Zedong began to plunder Tibet's wealth and murdered more than 1 million of its people. In the mid-1990s, the Chinese politburo implemented the "Strike Hard Campaign" that declared Buddhism "a disease to be eradicated." News of major protests in Tibet has not been widely disseminated in recent years, and now the survival of Tibetan civilization has reached a tipping point. In 2000, China launched a vast infrastructure campaign called "Opening and Development of the Western Regions" and embarked on a new phase of subjugation and control. Construction of rail and road links to Tibet, such as the Qingzang railway that opened last year, has accelerated Beijing's surveillance of Tibetans and has advanced the Sinofication of the Himalayan and Turkic peoples who inhabit China's western territories.

     Have no doubt the Chinese really do fear the Dali Lama and anyone else who can bring attention to their deplorable behavior towards the people of Tibet and elsewhere.  The more he and others like him are recognized and honored in the west the more internal trouble it creates for China, so lets give him the Presidebtial Medal of Freedom next year just to show the Chicoms that we haven't frogotten about Tibet and their repression of her.

Posted by: raging tachikoma at 02:40 AM | No Comments | Add Comment
Post contains 429 words, total size 3 kb.

     Weak nations talk about how strong they are, while strong nations let that power speak for its self.  The US is a strong nation, while Iran is most definately a weak nation. They talk, we demonstrate compare and contrast.

The US:

And Iran:

From the China Post, but just about everywhere really: Iran can fire 11,000 rockets a minute: commander.

     TEHRAN, Iran -- Iran is capable of firing 11,000 rockets into enemy bases within the first minute after any possible attack, state-run television quoted a top Revolutionary Guards Corps commander as saying Saturday.

     Gen. Mahmoud Chaharbaghi, the missile commander of the Guards, said Iran has identified all enemy positions and was prepared to respond in less than a minute to any possible attack.

     "Enemy bases and positions have been identified. ... The Guards ground force will fire 11,000 rockets into identified enemy positions within the first minute of any aggression against the Iranian territory," the television quoted Chaharbaghi as saying.

     Of course what the Iranians fail to mention is that most of these raockets are in fact just that unguided free flight artillery rockets whose accuracy is measured in hundreds of meters, and are of highly limited range.  Typical artillery rocket systems have maximu ranges of between fiteen to fifty miles for the larger system.  And the longer ou fling them the less accurate they become.  This is the main reason that the US MLRS and HIMARS systems use cluster munition warheads, rather than relying on one wrahead to hit the target each rocket carries over 600, making accuracy less of an issue.  As for their guided systems, thes are all either old Soviet system dating form the fifties and sixties or indeigenous variations thereof.  Alot of them are little better than upgraded Scuds, which itself is directly descended from the less than stellarly accurate V-2.   This is just more saber rattling by a nation that really doesn't have much in the way of sabers to be rattled.  The Iranians know how weak they are and this kind of posturing just proves that to anyone who looks at the reality of the Iranian's capability versus their daft proclamations.

Posted by: raging tachikoma at 02:34 AM | No Comments | Add Comment
Post contains 365 words, total size 3 kb.

     Czar Putin must be really worried about the US missile defense program given how often he and his underlings have been lambasting the expansion of the program to include US allies in Europe and Asia.  I can't but help to wonder if their nuclear forces are less capable than we currently believe if they are this worked up over a system that is currently aimed at small scale threats ike Iran and North Korea.  More likely they see it as a counter to any potential nuclear blackmail they may need to try in the future given the rather pathetic state of Russia's conventional forces.  If you can defend against a limited attack you can only threaten a general attack that will result in your destruction as well, so they want to impede any missile defense efforts that will limit their options.  Nations act in self interest first and foremost, and Russia is no exception, but she should recogonize that she has very limited weight on the international scene in this day and age.

From the Japan Times: Russia opposes Japan missile defense.

     MOSCOW (Kyodo) Russia is concerned about the Japan-U.S. project to develop a missile defense system, Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov said in a recent interview.

     The project is "a subject of concern from our side," Lavrov said Friday in a written response to questions prior to his visit to Japan later this month.

     "We are opposed to the construction of a missile defense system aimed at securing military superiority," he said in Russian, arguing the system could be directed at Russian and Chinese strategic arms.

     It is believed to be the first time Lavrov has publicly expressed strong concern over the U.S.-Japan defense system.

     Of course left unsaid in all this is that moscow has maintained a missile defense system since the 1960's and updates it regularly to deal with new threats.  It is ok for them to defend themselves but not for anyone else.  That is typical Russian chauvanism, one that clouds their view of the world and creates a lot of problems for them internationally on issues like this.  Putin needs to realize that Russia will never be a superpower and that no matter how much wealth he is able to bring into the country by selling off its natural resources he will never be able to match the west in terms of economic, military and political might.  Then maybe we could be free of all the hypocritical blather eminating from Moscow these days.

Posted by: raging tachikoma at 12:11 AM | No Comments | Add Comment
Post contains 421 words, total size 3 kb.

     The only reason the Chicoms are getting so upset over the whole visit of the Dali Lama with the president and the award he is recieving from congress is easy to spot.  He is right and they are wrong, and by honoring him the US is acknowledging that fact.  their occupation of Tibet is not an internal matter, as they so slef righteously claim, but rather the continued and illegal occupation of one sovergien state by another.  This is just further proof that tgers can't change their spots and communists can't take criticism.

From the Bangkok Post: US honours Dalai Lama, angers China.

     Washington (AFP) - US President George W. Bush on Wednesday asked China to open talks with the Dalai Lama, hours before attending a Congress ceremony honoring the Tibetan spiritual leader that has angered Beijing.

     "It's in their interest to meet with the Dalai Lama and I will say so at the ceremony today in Congress," Bush said before the controversial event where the Dalai Lama will receive a US Congressional Gold Medal - the highest civilian award bestowed by US lawmakers.

      It will be the first time a sitting US president appears in public with the 72-year-old Buddhist figurehead.

      Chinese Foreign Minister Yang Jiechi had warned that Bush's private meeting with the Dalai Lama on Tuesday and the Congress ceremony represented "a severe violation of the norms of international relations."

      He accused the United States of having "severely hurt" China's feelings and interfered in its internal affairs.

     In regards to china's "hurt feelings," they can kiss my ass and get the fuck over it.  We have every right to honor whom ever we want for wahtever reason we want, so why don't the Chinese stop meddling in our internal affairs.

Posted by: raging tachikoma at 12:08 AM | No Comments | Add Comment
Post contains 301 words, total size 2 kb.

Both From the Yomuiri Shimbun:  New antiterrorism law to last 1 year.

     The government decided Monday that a bill to establish a new law to continue the refueling mission by the Maritime Self-Defense Force in the Indian Ocean will include a one-year time limit.

     The new law, which would replace the Antiterrorism Law due to expire on Nov. 1, will not contain a clause stating that the government must periodically report on the MSDF's activities to the Diet.

       The rational for the new law is clear, but the editors at the Yomuiri and I are in agreement that a permanent solution is needed.  Japan is hamstrung by the need to pass a law in order to respond to each new crisis, and needs tp put in place a permanent law spelling out when and when not the SDF can become involved.

Japan mustn't quit war on terrorism.

     Japan must not abandon the war that the international community is waging against terrorism. It is a matter of course for the government and the ruling camp to do their utmost to quickly establish new legislation to replace the current Antiterrorism Law. The main opposition Democratic Party of Japan, for its part, will be tested on how it handles a bill for the new law.

     The government has submitted to the Diet the bill for the new antiterrorism law to allow the Maritime Self-Defense Force to continue its refueling mission in the Indian Ocean.

     The new law will limit the Self-Defense Force's antiterrorism support activities to the MSDF's refueling and water supply mission. The subjects of the mission will be limited to other countries' vessels participating in maritime interdiction activities to prevent the movement of terrorists and the transportation of weapons and drugs.

Permanent law needed.

     The government initially sought a two-year term for the new law. However, in consideration of New Komeito's view that having it enforced for one year would make it easier to maintain civilian control over the MSDF mission, the government set the term of the law at one year.

     But for Japan to properly tackle the war on terrorism, which will be a long and difficult task, the term of the law that governs the nation's efforts for the war should be longer. After the law is established, creating a permanent law regarding the overseas dispatch of the SDF likely will become a topic of discussion.

     Of course this would all be a moot point if the Japanese consitution is amended to remove article nine or the Japanese goverment decides that it can simply ignore article nine and get away with it.  I talked about that here and here.

JDS Murasame, DD-101. The lead ship in a class of nine multipurpose destroyers laid down in 1991.

Posted by: raging tachikoma at 11:43 PM | No Comments | Add Comment
Post contains 468 words, total size 4 kb.

     Ah, the 1911A1, perhaps the finest self loading handgun ever created.  A testament to its quality and reliability is that after ninety six (96) years it is still the preferered side arm of anyone in the US military who can lay their hands on one.  The Beretta M-9 is a good gun sure, but the 1911 is the 1911.  It is the supurlative of sidearms, accurate, reliable, rugged and good looking to boot.  That and it fires nice big and heavy 45 caliber ammo that will put some one down and keep them there.  Now modern bullet technology means that any good hollowpoint im 9mm or larger will do the job, but due to the US's cotinued observance of an outdated and scientifically disproven treaty soldiers on the battlefield are limited to ball ammo, in which case bigger is most definately better.  But then again a 9mm or .355 inch JHP will probably grow to be about 12.7mm or .5 inch at full expansion while a .451 or 11.7mm JHP will probably be nearly .750 to .800 inches or 22.5 to 23.25mm in size and a bigger hole is a better hole no matter how you slice it.

     As for simplicity, here she is fully detail stripped, and to get to this point all you need is either a combination tool which is little more than an L shaped piece of steel that doubles as a screw driver and punch.  In a pinch the gun can be stripped with nothing more than a round of 45acp ammo and its own parts doubling up as tools, now that is genuis.  Shown in the pics above leaning against a box of Federal 230 grain Hydrashoks.  I feel for my readers who live in less civilised and forward thinking places where owning such a fine weapon as this verboten.  As for me, I need to get off my backside and get me a licensce to carry concealed.

Posted by: raging tachikoma at 11:21 PM | Comments (4) | Add Comment
Post contains 333 words, total size 2 kb.

From the Voice of America via the Chosin Ilbo: Taipei Rejects Chinese President's Offer of Peace Talks.

     The Taiwan government has rejected China's offer of peace talks. Beijing's offer came Monday during the opening of the Communist Party's 17th Congress. Chinese President Hu Jintao called for negotiations with Taiwan to reach a peace agreement. But authorities in Taipei objected to Beijing's precondition that Taiwan accept the "one-China" principle.

     But in Taipei, government spokesman Shieh Jhy-wey rejected the offer of negotiations.  Shieh says Taiwan will not discuss peace, unification or anything else with a country that, in his words, oppresses Tibet, kills its own citizens, and supports the military government of Burma.

     Nor should they accept a one China position, because nothing could be farther from the truth, Taiwan is an independant and democratic nation.  It is right of them to reject a settlement that would infringe upon their sovergienty.  Mr. Jhy-wey was absolutely on point with his governments asessment of the Chicoms and their refusal to negotiate with them.  And to his list of crimes the PRC has committed may I add that they support North Korea, kill unborn babies against their parents will, imprison religous followers and opress anyone who speaks out against them, and I may add that is the short, short list.

Posted by: raging tachikoma at 10:45 PM | No Comments | Add Comment
Post contains 227 words, total size 2 kb.

     The recent huffing and puffing from China over the President's meeting with the Dali Lama makes me aask once again why we bother to give the murdering bastards in Beijing the legitimacy of full diplomatic recognition and not do the same to Taipei?  If we adopt a two China policy the PRC would have to accept it or accept the risk  of all the business they do with the US dissapears and their economy hits the wall and the social upheavals that would bring with it.  We need to stop dicking around and face up to the facts with the PRC, thery are our enemies, and we should do everything we can to support our friends rather than offering deference to our enemies.

A quick comparison between the two.

From the Yomuiri Shimbun: China still curbing freedom of speech.

     "The Chinese government still strictly controls free speech, but don't you think freedom [in society] has been gradually spreading thanks to social changes in the past 20 to 30 years?"

     I asked Chinese author Zhou Qing this question after he delivered a speech in Tokyo earlier this month.

     He replied: "[Government] control of free speech remains unchanged. [What appears to be freedom] is merely superficial. What made you think such a thing?"

     The Beijing-based author was promoting his book on the danger of Chinese food, titled "What Kind of God: A Survey of the Current Safety of China's Food."

     Though I intended to ask for his opinion on freedom of speech in China, Zhou apparently thought I lacked a proper understanding of the situation in the country.

     "I find your [question] absurd. [So-called liberalization] is not the result of changes made by the Chinese government. It's a result of pressure from the international community," he said. "Dictators will never change."

     Zhou, who took part in the pro-democracy demonstrations in Tiananmen Square in 1989, was later arrested and imprisoned for nearly three years.

     After his release, he was labeled a traitor by the government, which restricted his activities as a writer. But he refused to give up his career, despite such pressures.

     By far the most pongiant remark is at the end of the interview, and sums up the innate desire of the people of China to be free of the shackles of their repressive regieme.

     "I hid in mountains in the Ningxia autonomous region [of north central China], where I was given refuge by local residents. They fed me eggs every day, a valuable item for them. I was very impressed and believed China would become democratized one day," he said.

     For comparison this took place recently in Taipei, I wonder how the goverment of the PRC would have reacted if this had taken place in Beijing.

From the China Post: Thousands march in Taipei for gay rights.

     TAIPEI, Taiwan -- Thousands of homosexuals staged a Gay Pride march in Taipei yesterday to demand equal rights and the legalization of gay marriage.

     The parade took a carnival-like mood with marchers waving rainbow flags, colorful balloons and signs. Some were dressed in flamboyant period costumes, with brides and grooms, nurses and sailors while others only wore swim trunks despite the cool weather.

      I want some one, anyone in theis administartion or the next one to finally stand up to the Chicoms and tell them that they can either learn to live with the fact that there are two Chinas, or that their is only one, and it is not theirs.  But sadly I know that business will override principles once again in our dealings with the thugs of Beijing.

Posted by: raging tachikoma at 10:34 PM | No Comments | Add Comment
Post contains 591 words, total size 5 kb.

From Fox News: North Carolina Rep. Walter Jones Calls for Inquiry of Army General Involved in Soldier Scrutiny.

     WASHINGTON —  Rep. Walter Jones, R-N.C., has asked the Pentagon to open an investigation of a high-ranking Army official who is at the center of two probes involving possible wrong-doing by U.S. forces in Afghanistan.

     Jones said he believes Lt. Gen. Frank Kearney has overstepped his authority in the investigations and in turn is hurting troops' morale.

     "When men and women are asked to go to war for this country, then in my humble opinion they should be given every benefit of the doubt, and if there are any questions then they should not be handled in the press," Jones said in an interview with FOX News.

     I, and I am sure a lot of other people are glad to see that the highly questionable behavior of Gen. Kearney is finally being looked into.  It has been a point of serious contention and complaint among personel in the Afghan theater and people back home for some time now.  His continual invetsigations into behavior that has been deemed perfectly acceptable, and his sudden withdrawl of  a USMC unit for being too aggressive should have raised flags on the hill some time ago, or if not their then at the Pentagon.  If nothing else he needs to be removed from command and sent to job where he can do no further harm to our efforts in Afghanistan.

Posted by: raging tachikoma at 10:10 PM | No Comments | Add Comment
Post contains 246 words, total size 2 kb.

From the New york Times of all places: China opens 17^th Party Congress.

      President Hu Jintao promised to address social fissures, a degraded environment and rampant corruption during his second term as China’s top leader, but he all but ruled out more than cosmetic political reform in his opening address on Monday at the 17th National Congress of the governing Communist Party.
 
     Mr. Hu spoke extensively about his “scientific view of development,” a set of lofty, vague principles supporting harmonious economic, social and political development.

      The congress will enshrine the phrase “scientific view of development” into the party’s constitution alongside the political slogans of Mao, Deng Xiaoping and Jiang Zemin, elevating Mr. Hu into the pantheon of leaders as he begins his second and final term as party general secretary, head of state and military chief.

     The Chinese won't cahnge because the people at the top benefit from keeping the sytem as it currently is.  And to do so would be to admit that all of China's problems are in fact of the state's and therefore, Party's making.  Here is a fine example of that, form the Tai Pei Times: Millions more relocated for PRC's Three Gorges Dam.

     Four million more people are to be relocated away from China's Three Gorges Dam area, state media reported yesterday, weeks after officials warned of a potential "environmental catastrophe" there.

     Already 1.4 million people have been forced to leave their homes to make way for the world's largest hydropower project, which started operations last year, but the new announcement has radically expanded the resettlement project.

     The 4 million residents who will be "encouraged" to leave their homes live near the dam's reservoir, which extends for 600km, the China Daily reported, citing local officials.

     So many people saw this coming, and gave repeated and vocal warnings makes this all the more tragic for the simple peasants who are being forced from their homes.  Hubris drove this project, and now it is rearing its ugly head and turning on its creators.  The Chinese are having to spend more and more of their time holding their fragile and restive nation together as these two pieces from the City Journal demonstrate.

Breaking the Chinese Code

     Welcome to the People’s Republic, land of “harmony” and “community.”

     First: “harmony.” For the Chinese government, it means “suppression of individualism.” Errant thoughts threaten central control of the masses. Dissent is bad and punishable. John Stuart Mill correctly wondered whether, under an autocratic regime, “there would be any asylum left for individuality of character; whether public opinion would not be a tyrannical yoke; whether the absolute dependence of each on all, and the surveillance of each by all, would not grind all down into a tame uniformity of thoughts, feelings, and actions.” In China, the reigning belief is that nonconforming ideas will fracture the enforced consensus and produce factionalism. There seems to be no James Madison in power who can raise his head and point out that having numerous factions enables governance of a large country.

     Chinese leaders fear the huge and growing gaps between urban and rural, rich and poor, coastal and interior residents, and those with and without “guanxi” (connections). Inharmoniousness is rife. Preaching harmony is a desperate measure, and it is not enough. The hopeful view: this is stop-gap rhetoric while national policy shifts from economic development to the more intractable issue of societal development in an authoritarian state. But the hopeful view may not reflect reality.

     The desperation of the Chinese is beginning to become apparent, despite their best efforts the lid is nearly constantly threating to come off.  For now the pot simmers, but the risk of a massive boil over is always right there.

     But the “community” is not quite what it seems. All residents in the harmonious community are equal, but some are (much) more equal than others—in Orwell’s trenchant phrase. Three distinct populations exist in a community—residents, visitors, and migrants—and they have very different rights. China has some 200 million migrants, well more than 10 percent of the workforce, and they constitute up to 28 percent of a city’s population. Migrant workers are akin to illegal aliens in the United States. Their labor helps staff the factories, but their families, who would strain the capacities of community services, are unwelcome. Therefore migrants aren’t officially members of the “communities” where they live. This may help explain why officials assert that the community, not the family, is the “basic unit of society.” If the families of migrants are excluded, how could the family possibly be that basic unit?

The only real change to China will come only when the people force the corrupt and illegitimate Communists from power and take back what is rightfully theirs.

The Empire of Lies.

     Before the totalitarian reign of Mao Zedong and his immediate successors, never in human history had an entire nation been under such intense surveillance. The Chinese not only had to speak alike; they had to think alike. The Communist Party regulated every aspect of private life. In the sixties, it even sought to anesthetize all feeling, commanding hundreds of millions of Chinese to repeat mindlessly the slogan of the day; one of Mao’s sayings would have to preface any “personal conversation.” A few second-rate books were the only permissible reading material, and eight revolutionary operas provided the sole entertainment. Placed everywhere—city squares, railway stations, factories, and offices—Party loudspeakers blared martial music from dawn to dusk, making it physically impossible for people to speak or think. The state imprisoned and killed untold numbers of its subjects.

     Things have obviously changed, much for the better. China is no longer totalitarian. Yet the 60-million-member Communist Party, if subtler, remains cruel and omnipresent. When I met Madam Ding Zilin at the Golden Carp Café, I had to lean in close to listen. In Beijing, true privacy is only possible in such a public place. Ding Zilin felt that the security agents who shadow her every movement wouldn’t be able to record her confidences above the noisy laughter and the clamor of the waitresses moving to and fro.

     Another sign of the desire for freedom, particularly worrisome to the authorities, is the explosion of peasant revolts in the Chinese countryside. The countryside is an immense universe, immutable and mysterious even for Chinese city dwellers, who go there only to honor the tombs of ancestors. Traveling to a village is like taking a journey in time; old China emerges, and modernity seemingly slips away. It also is to encounter China’s communication problem: peasants, unfamiliar with the national language, speak only in regional dialects—though television, the great linguistic and cultural leveler, is making the country more homogeneous by the day.

Posted by: raging tachikoma at 12:02 AM | No Comments | Add Comment
Post contains 1809 words, total size 14 kb.

The Earth rising over the Moon, photographed by Astronaut Bill Anders of Apollo 8, December 24, 1967.  NASA Photo.

     I have never really said this out loud, but one of my deepest wishes is to be an Astronaut.  I would give just about anything to be able to float in the void of space or to stand upon the hauntingly beautiful surface of the moon and look back at the planet that we all call home.  While the number of men and women who have ventured into space is small, and only twelve men, Americans all have had the chance to set foot on a heavenly body that is not Earth.  My envy of them beggars description, yet I also know that perhaps I too, may have a chance to do the same.  Many years of my life lay yet before me, and the nature of space travel is constantly evolving.  I do not know what it is about spaceflight, or even flight in general that entrnaces me so, perhaps it is the beauty of seeing the eath from above, or the feeling of freedom that soaring through the skies briings with it.  Whatever it is it has held me fascinated for as long I can possibly remember.

     But even if I never have the chance to look down upon our graceful and magnificent blue orb I can still look up into the heavens above and allow my self to be lost in the simple beauty of the stars, planets and other celstial wonders, and all of their vast and unexplored secrets.  What makes humanity so unique among all of God's creatures is that we, and we alone strive for knowledge simply for the sake of having that knowledge.  We are propelled to explore space for the same reason Edmund Hillary climbed Mt. Everest, because it is there.  Even when it is beyond our capability to explore first hand our celestial meighbors we find a way to go and visit them none the less.  The may be machines, but in their own way the are an extension of human life, and proof our exsistence.  For they will remain wher they are long after all of us are gone onto whatever awaits in the next life.  They shall remain, proving that we where here, and that we did all we could to find life beyond our own world and to learn all we could about everything we could.  Sometimes even robots get homesick I guess, at leat that was what I thought when I first saw this picture.

Posted by: raging tachikoma at 10:13 PM | No Comments | Add Comment
Post contains 648 words, total size 4 kb.

     The Noble Peace Prize went to Al Gore and his buddies at the IGPCC.  This merely adds more weight to what we have known for a long time, outside of the awards for the sciences and other measurable fields the Noble Prize is all about treanzie politics than rewarding the good work of people who are actually trying to bring peace and democracy to their part of the world.

A suitably indignant piece from the Wall Street Journal: Not Nobel Winners.

     In Olso Friday, the 2007 Nobel Peace Prize was not awarded to the Burmese monks whose defiance against, and brutalization at the hands of, the country's military junta in recent weeks captured the attention of the Free World.

     The prize was also not awarded to Morgan Tsvangirai, Arthur Mutambara and other Zimbabwe opposition leaders who were arrested and in some cases beaten by police earlier this year while protesting peacefully against dictator Robert Mugabe.

     Or to Father Nguyen Van Ly, a Catholic priest in Vietnam arrested this year and sentenced to eight years in prison for helping the pro-democracy group Block 8406.

     Or to Wajeha al-Huwaider and Fawzia al-Uyyouni, co-founders of the League of Demanders of Women's Right to Drive Cars in Saudi Arabia, who are waging a modest struggle with grand ambitions to secure basic rights for women in that Muslim country.

Posted by: raging tachikoma at 09:24 PM | No Comments | Add Comment
Post contains 235 words, total size 2 kb.

     Many of my fellow conservative are often heard lambasting the concept of the right to privacy as being a fallacy, nothing could be further from the truth.  Just because the words are not explicitly stated anywhere in the bill of rights and subsequent amendments the exsistence of such a right is easy enough to see by looking at the plain meaning of the words of the fourth, ninth and fourteenth amendments.  their protections and inhabitions create a clear and readily identifable concept of privacy that was in the monds of the men who wrote those words. The words below offer a fine insight into the view of the court on this issue when the right to privacy was first articulated.

     Justice John Marshall Harlan II famously wrote, "the full scope of the liberty guaranteed by the Due Process Clause cannot be found in or limited by the precise terms of the specific guarantees elsewhere provided in the Constitution. This 'liberty' is not a series of isolated points pricked out in terms of the taking of property; the freedom of speech, press, and religion; the right to keep and bear arms; the freedom from unreasonable searches and seizures; and so on. It is a rational continuum which, broadly speaking, includes a freedom from all substantial arbitrary impositions and purposeless restraints."

      On a point by point basis I will examine and explain how each of the three amendments I have noted above contribute to the exsistence of a right to privacy.  The first and perhaps most pertinent amendment is one of the two least talked about amendments of the constitution along with its companion, the 9^th.

     The enummeration of certain rights shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.

     The 9^th amendment is an interesting creature, massively important, yet terribly ignored by the courts and the legal profession.  This amendment was along with the 10^th the comprimise necessary to get the Federalists to go along with the Anti-Federalists demands for a bill of rights.  To put it simply it allayed the fears of the Federalists that just because a right was not mentioned did not mean it didn't exsist.  Rather it does exsist and it belongs only to the people as only rights can.  Thus it follows that the right to privacy does indeed exsist, even though it was not specifically enummerated, and is given protection equal to the enummerated rights.

     Given that , in the words of John Adams freedoms are more inumerable than grains of sand upon a beach one must indeed tread lightly when it comes to dismissing a right just because it isn't in the constitution as it is written.

    The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and siezures will not be violated, and no warrants shall issue but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, amd particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be siezed.

     The 4^th amendment protects people from unreasonable searches and siezures, but what is more important is what it describes as being protected.  ones person, home, papers and effects (property).  What is this but the right to privacy described in excruiating detail?  This gives people the right to be free from state interference in their lives by forbidding the state from prying into the activities of its citizens.  Except when in posession of a valid warrant the government can not violate your person, home, property and papers except in rare and very specific circumstances.  Here in plain english is the right that so many people have said is not in the constitution is right before them if they would choose to see it.

     Article 1:  All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.  No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privliges and immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shallany State deprive any person of life. liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction equal protection of the laws.

     Article 5:  The Congress shall have the power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisons of this article.

Note: (Articles 2, 3, and 4 deal with issues related to the civil war and former comfederates and the public debt of the US and are excluded for non-relevance and brevity.) 

     The 14^th amendments contirbution to the right to privacy is the hardest to articulate, and therefore tends to come in for the most criticism.  The basic position is that, each individual must be treated equally by the state, and the stae can not discriminate in the treatment of it's citizens by applying laws to some and not to others.  These cases sighting this facet of the right to privacy tend to revolve around things like birth control, abortion and state laws prohibiting certain types of consenual sexual intercourse.  Generally though I see the 14^th amendment as forcing the restrictions of the 4^th and 9^th amenments onto the states, as the drafters of the 14^th amendment intended.

     No one who espouses to be a conservative can not make a decent argument against the exsistance of the right to privacy, rather they revert to the charge of Judicial activism.  This is largely motivated by a desire to advance the 'conservative' (read moral) agenda on abortion and gay marriage.  Two topics about which I give exactly a damn.  I have a strong libertarian streak when it comes to what consenting adults do to themselves and between themselves.  I believe abortion is morally reprehensable, but that does not give me, or anyone else the right to tell someone else what they can do with thier body.  I want less government at every level, not more, and trying to legislate morality is simply counter productive to that goal.  I hope that this election cycle we can discard the 'moral' issues and focus on the real problems in the world today, like say terrorism and the war, or lowering taxes etc, etc.  Well enough ranting for now.

Posted by: raging tachikoma at 07:33 PM | No Comments | Add Comment
Post contains 1041 words, total size 7 kb.

From First Multi National Force Iraq and Defend America:

Airmen Patrol Streets of Baghdad.

Diamond heroes visit battlefield heroes.

Soldiers capture kidnapper, free hostage. (Adhamiyah)

Concerned Citizens discover improvised explosive device. (Arab Jabour)

Citizen volunteers vastly improve security in Iraq’s Diyala Province.

Marines team with Iraqi Security Forces.

International news links, Oct. 13, 2007.

Scouts assist in propane distribution. (Arab Jabour)

Coalition forces disrupt terrorist operations; one killed, 17 detained.

New Iraqi Air Force Continues to Grow.

Afghan National Police Continue Progress.

Coalition forces clear former insurgent stronghold.

Renovations Bring Reliable Power.

The ships of the US Navy's Destroyer Squadron 15 Steaming in the Pacific during exercise Valiant Shield '06.

Posted by: raging tachikoma at 01:15 AM | No Comments | Add Comment
Post contains 115 words, total size 2 kb.

     Of all the things I mentioned as positives for Welcome to the N.H.K. I forgot to add that this book is populated by crazy people.  I don't mean they think their Jesus or Napoleon crazy, but obsessed, compulsive craziness that drives the characters to do what they do.  The deeper into this story I get the more intrigued I become.  TokyoPop bills this series as a comedy, but I think that is a disservice to both this series and to straight comedic series.  This more of drama with a pinch f romance and fair helping of gallows humor.  Even the person who at first appears to be the most stable and together of the bunch turns out to have a lot of problems of their own.  By the close of this the most recent volume I am left with the conclusion that the main characters represent to sides of the same coin, and as a result are antaganistic toward each other as defense mechanism to keep from admitting that they are alike, and consequently being able to provide a counter balance for the other.  They both fear essentially the same thing, but they express it at opposite ends of the spectrum of human behavior.  Can they ever come to see that they need each other, but not as opposites, but rather as two parts of a whole.  Take these ramblings for whatever they are worth to you, I could be totally wrong, but the more I think about it the more it makes sense to me.

Posted by: raging tachikoma at 09:02 PM | No Comments | Add Comment
Post contains 261 words, total size 2 kb.

       File this one under some people have all the luck, as for me, well I saw an Action #1 once, at a convention, in locked bulletproof glass case.  This dude on the other hand is wondering around a yard sale and finds a NM Detecive #27.  Man I would settle for Giant Size X-Men or Spiderman #1, much less finding one of the legendary Golden Age books.

From Fox News: Near-Mint Comic Featuring Batman's Debut, Worth $250,000, Found in Pennsylvania Attic.

     A near-mint copy of Detective Comics No. 27, a pre-World War II comic featuring Batman's debut, was recently found in an attic and sold to a local collector.

     The comic is considered to be the second-most valuable available and can fetch up to $500,000. The only comic considered more valuable is Action Comics No. 1, in which Superman makes his first appearance.

     Collector Todd McDevitt said the Batman issue he bought is worth about $250,000, but he won't say exactly how much he paid or who sold it to him.

     "It was a typical story of someone cleaning up junk in their attic and finding an old comic book and wondering if this was one of those ones that was worth a lot of money," McDevitt told the Beaver County Times.

     When the seller walked in with the Batman issue, "my eyes almost popped out of my head," McDevitt said.

    Even through the massive fog of envy I can give this piece of advice, hand carry that bad bpy to CGC and get it graded, because then it will be worth an even more ridculous amount of cash.

^{lucky bastard.}

Posted by: raging tachikoma at 03:55 PM | No Comments | Add Comment
Post contains 274 words, total size 2 kb.

From the Taipei Times: State of a hemmed-in nation.

     This is one fine editorial, I sympathize greatly with Taiwan, she has been betrayed by her protector and denied the basic recognition that is the right of every sovergein government, of which Taiwan's certainly is.  It is heartening to see that despite her difficult situation Taiwan continues to mature and develop as free and democratic nation, in stark contrast to the illegitimate and repessive regieme across the strait.

     We noted last year that beyond the hardware, these nationalist displays have a hollow core and that nationalism is ill-served by symbols and rhetoric that simply serve as face-saving mechanisms for organs of state. Meanwhile, the alternative -- that Taiwan is part of China and the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) is the natural party to rule all of China -- is so discredited now that even chunks of the KMT cannot bring themselves to spout it in public.

     By and large, however, Taiwan is chugging along nicely, with solid economic credentials and growth, even if inflationary pressures are building. Shunting aside media hyperbole, Taiwan remains one of the safest countries in the world, with encouraging standards of education, growing (if erratically distributed) income and a good international reputation in various sectors.

     In recent years the picture of Taiwan in the international eye has bounced back and forth between the predatory neuroses of China and the political mandates of competing foreign-affairs factions in the US -- the balance of which has not helped Taiwan to expand its global space.

This an excellent piece of writing go read the whole thing, go on read it all here

Posted by: raging tachikoma at 01:50 PM | No Comments | Add Comment
Post contains 281 words, total size 2 kb.

From the Taipei Times: Fukuda seeks greater military role.

     Japanese Prime Minister Yasuo Fukuda yesterday told a resurgent opposition that Japan must not be a "bystander" in the US-led "war on terror" as he fought to extend a naval mission in the Indian Ocean.

     The opposition won control of one house of parliament in July elections and has vowed to defeat government proposals to extend the naval mission providing fuel and logistical support to US-led forces in Afghanistan.

     It has so far ignored a government compromise that would stop refueling operations backing combat troops, restricting support to ships policing the Indian Ocean.

     Addressing a parliamentary committee attended by key lawmakers from the ruling coalition and opposition, Fukuda said that Japan, as the world's second-largest economy, needed to contribute to international security.

     Saying that the international community was united after the 2001 terrorist attacks on the US, Fukuda said: "How can we sit back as a bystander?"

     He also assured the opposition that the Indian Ocean mission does not violate Japan's pacifist Constitution, which was imposed by the US after World War II.

     "First of all, the mission is not an act of force," Fukuda said. "It does not infringe on the Constitution at all."

     Ok, Ozawa doesn't want the MSDF to support combat ops but he is OK with sending ground troops to participate in ISAF, where the inevitable result would be real, live (or dead) Japanese casaulties.  This plays up what I was saying earlieer, the longer you go with out adressing the reality of the situation the more warped your preception of reality becomes.  If Fukuda wants to play a bigger role in such military operations he should go ahead and do one of three things.

1.  Bluntly admit that the mere exsistance of the SDF violates the constitution (which it does as noted here) and that of you are already in violation then there is nothing holding Japan back from violating the rest of article nine.  Call this the 'in for a penny, in for a pound' approach.

2.  Force through a revision to the constitutional amendment law to get rid of the three year waiting period before the constitution can be amended and move for an immeadate amendment of article nine.  This is the legalistic approach, and the one that offers the most legitimacy, at least to those that would scream bloody murder if Japan went for option one.

3.  Deny that the current constitution is not binding on Japan due to the fact that it was adopted under duress.  This of course ignores the fact the current constitution was ratified by a plebicite before it came into effect, but the argument can be made that the involvement of the occupying power in the drawing up of the governmental charter taints it due to the clearly superior-inferior status of the two nations. 

     Of these three options I would say one would only happen if a PM had an unassailable majority in both houses, massive popularity and a mjor crisis on Japan's doorstep, in which case national security takes precedence over what other people may think.  Number two is by far the most likely, but still a long shot as the DPJ was largely opposed to the current amendment law that was passed back in may.  As for number three it is only possible on an earth in some paralell universe, the political  and practical fall out at home and abroad would simply not be worth the results in any sense of the word.

     So how do you play a bigger role in military operations when you can not allow your military to actually fight?  That is a question that I certainly can't answer, one can either fight or not.  I am deeply apreciative of the actions that Japan has taken thus far, but once more I have to say that Prime Minister Fukuda should change the debate from wether or not Japan should be supporting such operations, but rather why she must participate directly, and that article nine is a relic of the past that needs to placed firmly where it belongs, in the past.

Posted by: raging tachikoma at 01:08 PM | No Comments | Add Comment
Post contains 695 words, total size 5 kb.